Privacy in the Digital Age: Whose Data Is It, Anyway?
Concerns about privacy on the Internet have always been out there, but news events of late seem to be bringing this problem more and more into the public eye.
Earlier this month, Google began implementing its “new” privacy policy – despite opposition from many parties, including French and European Union regulators. The new privacy policy allows Google to consolidate what it knows about users across all of its services, something it had never done before. According to Google, this makes for a “simpler, more intuitive Google experience.”
It’s not just search engines themselves falling under watch for privacy problems. Early in February, the popular Path and Hipster apps were discovered to be uploading user address books to their servers. Later on, it was discovered that both iOS and Android suffered from problems that allowed apps access to user photos even if they had not granted that particular permission.
So far, there really hasn’t been a good set of guidelines that companies holding our data could be held accountable to and asked to follow. Essentially, companies with access to our private data were left to their own devices when it came to treating that data – with predictable consequences to our privacy.
In February, it was announced that many advertising networks and leading Internet companies such as AOL, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo have all agreed to implement the Do Not Track feature: essentially, it stops websites (and advertising networks) from tracking users. This blocks certain practices used by advertisers, such as personalized advertising. (We discussed personalized advertising earlier on our ebook Be Privy to Online Privacy.)
This was in line with a White House blueprint for what it called a “Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights”. The set of principles that the white paper includes are all sound and, frankly, common sense: they give user’s online data the same set of protections that they should have offline. Fundamentally, the US approach calls for Internet companies and industries to voluntarily adopt regulations which are then enforced by regulatory agencies.
Does this mean that users no longer have to worry about their privacy, that advertisers and website owners will no longer abuse what they know about users? Sadly, that is far from being the case
The Do Not Track announcement was not about anything that could be immediately implemented. How Do Not Track will actually be implemented – and thus, whether it actually works – is not yet entirely clear. In short, it will take some time for Do Not Track to actually be something that users can turn on.
What these steps do mean is that regulators are finally paying attention to privacy as an issue, and companies are realizing that they have to start paying some attention, instead of just issuing blanket statements that said nothing. European privacy regulators have already launched a probe into Google’s new privacy policy. As a result of a settlement with California authorities, app store operators like Apple and Google have agreed in principle to make app developers include privacy policies if their apps gather user information.
User concern about tracking and personal privacy is very real. A Pew Research poll found that almost two-thirds of American search engine users disapproved of personalized search results. A similar number had negative views on targeted advertising. A separate study by the University of Queensland found similar attitudes among Australian users. Clearly, users have serious concerns about what kind of information is gathered about them, and how this information is being used.
The debate over privacy in the digital age will, no doubt, continue. Different people will have different standards for what they consider the acceptable trade-off between convenience and privacy is. Users should be free, however, to make that decision for themselves – and to have the information and tools to decide where their data will end up going.
Post from: TrendLabs | Malware Blog – by Trend Micro
Privacy in the Digital Age: Whose Data Is It, Anyway?
Spotlight
Cloud Computing
- Security in backups means more than just encryption
- Employees must buy into the company policy for better cloud security
- Desktop virtualization can enhance security performance
- Cybersecurity cooperation becoming military necessity
Virtualization
- Virtualization-specific challenges could threaten data security
- Evolving threats put security skills in high demand
- Virtualization security requires education, access control management
- Tips for launching effective virtual security tools
Internet Safety
- Virtualization-specific challenges could threaten data security
- Evolving threats put security skills in high demand
- Virtualization security requires education, access control management
- Tips for launching effective virtual security tools
Vulnerabilities & Exploits
CTO Insights
First Line of Defense
Newsletter
Stay up to date with the latest news and information on online threats.
Recent News
- FBI trying to train financial execs on cyber threats
- Wall Street has data security concerns over Bloomberg reporting
- Security in backups means more than just encryption
- Employees must buy into the company policy for better cloud security
Tag Cloud
cloud cloud computing cloud computing security Cloud Security Compliance & Regulations Consumerization Current News cybercrime Data Privacy data security Encryption Government Policy Internet Protection Internet Safety Internet Safety - DO NOT USE Internet Security Malware Mobile Security Mobility Policy Policy - DO NOT USE Privacy Privacy & Policy Private Cloud Public Cloud Reports Research Spotlight threat intelligence threat research Trend Labs Underground Economy virtualization Vulnerabilities Vulnerabilities - DO NOT USE web security web threats



Comments
No comments yet
The comments are closed.